Our numbers for Long Island for
Security, Fire Alarm, and CCTV installation, sales, repairs, inspections, due to the storm: 631-745-0447 and 631-331-9082
or nyfiremaster@gmail.com
MES SECURITY SYSTEMS
For Northern NJ : 201-444-3219
SOKOLY ELECTRIC AND ALARMS
(Also for Generator install, repair, and service as well as Electrical install, repair and service)
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Sandy Help
Sunday, November 4, 2012
UL Guide for Floodwater/Electrical Equipment
http://www.ul.com/global/documents/offerings/perspectives/regulators/electrical/flooding/UL_Floodwater_Brochure_2009.pdf
Storm Related Info for Water Damaged Electrical Equipment
Evaluating Water-Damaged Electrical Equipment is available for download at no charge at no charge at www.nema.org/stds/water-damaged.cfm.
It provides advice on the safe handling of electrical equipment that
has been exposed to water and outlines items that require complete
replacement or that can be reconditioned by a trained professional.
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
A New Approval
Nassau County New York office of the Fire Marshal has approved and accepted the Arlington FL-430/FLS-430 support Box for Commercial Fire Alarm Installation in Suspended Ceiling Tile Locations where Smoke Detectors are installed. UL listed for luminaires up to 50 lbs and smoke detectors up to 25 lbs!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SK1SjspN5bI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SK1SjspN5bI
Friday, September 21, 2012
Is Derating the same as Safety Factor?
No - derating factor is different from the safety factor. The derating factor is used as the basis of calculation to determine worst-case performance for EOL voltages: when the batteries are at the end of their life expectancy (5 years) and the battery output voltage has decreased (15%) the result is the panel's output voltage will similarly be reduced (unless it is documented by UL to have compensation circuitry). Accordingly, circuits that used to be calculated using 24VDC are now calculated using 20.4VDC as the base voltage. Then the circuit load calculations are done using the UL max current draws - which are measured at the lowest listed operating voltage (typically 16VDC).
The safety factor is to provide additional power beyond what the minimum calculations show will be required to operate the system, to compensate for minor system additions or changes. (2010 at 10.5.6.3.1)
The de-rating factor is applied to the voltage, the safety factor is applied to the amperage.
The Safety factor is upping the battery capacity after calculating the proper standby and alarm capacity needed to operate a system
The safety factor is to provide additional power beyond what the minimum calculations show will be required to operate the system, to compensate for minor system additions or changes. (2010 at 10.5.6.3.1)
The de-rating factor is applied to the voltage, the safety factor is applied to the amperage.
The Safety factor is upping the battery capacity after calculating the proper standby and alarm capacity needed to operate a system
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Message from God
The difference between GOD and the FIRE MARSHALL is that GOD does not think that he is the FIRE MARSHALL
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Thursday, August 9, 2012
NEW TECHNOLOGIES: Z-WAVE, ZIGBEE, LOWES, AND VERIZON WHO GETS CAUGHT “HOLDING THE BAG”
Here we go again! As newer technologies reach into our
Business and our pockets, it’s time to discuss some recent issues. Our Product
Manufacturers have graciously afforded us with cutting edge technologies that
make our customers believe they can control everything in their home from their
remote locations, get instant access to their alarm status and control, control
their thermostats and lighting and feed the dog, too. Of particular interest is
GE, DSC, ADEMCO, HONEYWELL, NAPCO, etc examination and use of Z-Wave Technology
for control of Devices such as Lighting Switches, Outlets, and Thermostats, to
name just a few. Without going into how it works, advantages/disadvantages, or
cost (I’m no expert in those areas) I’d Like to address an issue with these
devices I am familiar with. That is, are you properly licensed to install
certain hardware associated with these technologies? We all should realize that
our 6D license allows us to install, program and interface with the Security,
Home Automation, AV and Lighting Control aspects of these technologies. We are
allowed to wire, install, maintain and service Security and Fire Alarm Systems
in NYS. These Systems particularly pertain to Voltages of 90V or less ( read
Suffolk’s Restricted Electrical License Law- 90V for that….bet you didn’t know
that Suffolk Restricts HVAC contractors to 60V!) The Suffolk License applies to
non-security/fire/access/CCTV that is NOT Monitored by any entity (use your
discretion or better yet, call them as to what the term “ non-monitored”
applies to. I can tell you that it DOES apply to: Door Bells, Central Vac
wiring, Audio, Video, Network Cabling, LAN and WAN wiring, Door Camera’s, Baby Cams)The Restricted
License is basically treated just like an Electrical License. You need 7 years
of Documented (pay stubs, W-2’s, etc) to prove work experience before you can
apply for it. Yes, a written and Practical exam is required! Insurance
requirements are there as well. At issue is the installation of devices such as
switches, outlets, thermostat controls and appliance modules. Our Distributors
offer us Z-Wave replacement Switches, Outlets,Thermostats and the like right on
the shelf next to our alarm products and devices. We are in no way restricted
in PURCHASING these devices from them, just like any consumer buys from Home
Depot or Lowes. The problem lies in installing these devices. We are NOT Master
Electricians ( Unless, of course we ARE) and I’m sure Ken Kirschenbaum will
agree, that We or one of our Company principles (Pres., VP, Secretary, or
Treasurer)who has intimate knowledge of day to day business operations must be
a Licensed Master Electrician in the jurisdictions we are installing these
device in. Otherwise, we should be retaining the Services of a Properly
Licensed Master Electrician in those jurisdictions. Of course, some dealers
complain that when you explain to the customer that the fancy schmanzy home
automation system you just sold him needs the services of someone more
qualified than you…the deal goes south. “Do you have an Electrician you use
that you can call to install these devices” was a question a prominent alarm
dealer just posed in a recent discussion with myself and a distributor. As soon
as the words left his mouth the customer’s response was: “why AND is it going
to cost me more money?” DEAL DONE! “Sorry, I’m not interested anymore.” He has
10 salesmen trying to foist this scenario! So here’s what you need to know.
According to Sal Ferrara, Owner of The Electrical Training Center LI and an
NFPA 70 Code expert and Master Electrician Instructor on Long Island, “it’s
perfectly ok for a Master Electrician to assist an Alarm Dealer or his
Technicians in proper Line Voltage wiring techniques. You don’t need to be
licensed to receive proper information and or instruction. The issue is
liability.” Those technicians and their work are the responsibility of their
employer-The Alarm Company- they are not employees doing work under a Licensed Electrician.
IF they are allowed to install Z-Wave switches, outlets, etc under the
supervision of a Licensed Master Electrician they are STILL employees of the
Alarm Company and Liability rest with THEM. One way to properly be in
compliance is to subcontract the Line Voltage Work to the Electrician and HIS
employees. Of course, we all know that there will be added cost to this.
Typically hourly rates can be $125.00 per hour! Plan accordingly! Another issue
that was discussed was that you need to make sure that your Electrical
Contractor is properly licensed in ALL the jurisdictions you are doing this
work in. Suffolk’s ME does not cover Nassau County, Town of Hempstead does not
cover The Village of Freeport, Oyster Bay does not cover Suffolk County…..you get
the picture! If your company is installing those Z-wave thermostats, control
modules that are not plug-in or
are hardwired that control hot tubs, and appliances BE AWARE! Your 6D Alarm
License does NOT cover you for installing them. You need to be a Licensed
Master Electrician in the jurisdiction you are installing in OR in Suffolk
County, you need to be either an ME or have the Suffolk County Restricted
Electrical License (remember: “non-monitored”). To quote Ron Petrarca, Past
NYBFAA and LIAA President “these jokers don’t realize that liability is an ugly
issue. Most Alarm installers don’t have a clue that the lawyers will be looking
to pick them clean if some disaster, loss of property or life occurs due to
faulty, negligent installation practices” In my 6D License Classes I tell my
students the following: “just because you or a homeowner can go into Lowe’s
Home Depot , ADI or Alarmax, go to the shelf, purchase a switch or receptacle
(be it Line Voltage or Z-Wave), Buy the “Time-Life” Book of Home Electrical
Wiring, read it from cover to cover, go home or to a job, install the device,
and IT WORKS, DOES NOT MEAN YOU INSTALLED IT TO CODE OR SAFELY! Who inspects
that work? A Master Electrician is subject to local inspection requirements
followed by the jurisdictions he’s licensed in to assure a safe installation.
It is an unfortunate fact that homeowners can do their own wiring and
electrical work in their own homes.The issue is; have you or your technician
been properly trained and whose liability is it? You, by contract, held
yourself out to be qualified ,for hire, to properly do the work. Most will
agree, “If you accept money for payment, you are responsible for any and all
damages you cause.” If you’re a homeowner, hope you have your insurance policy
paid up to date. If you’re not properly licensed or trained or qualified to do
the work on a CUSTOMERS job-----guess who’s coming after you? A whole bunch of
vultures looking to pin the blame on YOU! Do yourself and your business a
favor. Get the proper Restricted Electrical License to do the work or partner
with a Licensed Master Electrician. For a list of recommended Licensed Master
Electricians you can call Electrical Training Center at 631-226-8021.
Mike Sokoly
MES Security Systems/Electrical Training Center
Secretary: Long Island Alarm Association
LICENSING, CONTRACTORS, AND TRUNK SLAMMERS
I recently had the “pleasure” of consulting for a
Licensed Master Electrician who also holds his own 6D License. The job was for
a very big corporate “fat cat” in the Hamptons. I was retained to assist in the
Installation of a $30K plus Security System. As most of us do our own
specification and design, I was somewhat taken back when the contractor
presented me with an incomplete design specification that was the result of the
electrician playing “match the Quote”, which he of course, won. My Job was to
then “consult” with the GC on the locations of devices. You can well understand
my distaste for Unqualified Designing when I was instructed by the GC,
via the owner’s “handler” that the design was NOT to be deviated from! Ok,so
I’m to located a $300 Bosch Smoke Detector IN the clients Master Bathroom, AND
directly over the Kitchen Cooking Appliances! Can’t Change it! On advice
to the GC, (unheeded, mind you) they were installed in incorrect locations. The Electrical/Alarm
Contractor was advised as well. Seeing as I was HIS employee (no subcontracting
agreement existed) I was on his payroll for the duration of the job, HE now
assumes the liability and responsibility for any alarm, trouble and install
issues that may result.
The Electrical/Alarm
Contractor was also contracted to install wiring ONLY(materials provided
by The “AV Contractor”: ( you’ll like
the rest of this story!) for Lighting Control, Home Automation Control,
Home AV, and Alarm Control via the Home Control System, all non-line voltage
wiring. Well, the Electrician seems covered for the Installation of the wiring
for the above systems via his Master Electrician License in Suffolk County. He
also is covered by his 6D License to install the Security System and associated
wiring. He’s properly licensed as a Master Electrician to install all the
Lighting Control Equipment and wiring. A properly Licensed Master Plumber was
contracted to install all the HVAC automation Control wiring and systems as
well, which the AV Contractor also interfaced with and controlled.
As Shakespeare once inferred: “Ah, now here’s
the rub!” Upon my astute investigation, here’s what I found: The AV Contractor
was hired and contracted by the owner for the “Installation” of the AV System
exclusive of the wiring installed by the ME. Because this Company “did such
excellent work”, was a contractor to “the Stars” before, got glowing accolades
in CEPRO Magazine and did the owner’s Manhattan Townhouse, he MUST know what
he’s doing and would be properly licensed and certified to perform this work,
right?
NOT
ON YOUR LIFE!
I
found out that:
1.) He and his Company( and his Partner, for
that matter) have NO Master Electrician License in Suffolk County ( Funny, I
personally observed his Technicians and Partner making Line Voltage connections
in a Lutron Lighting Control System Panel!)
2.)
He and His Company have NO Suffolk County Restricted Electrical License for
Voltages under 90V and wiring associated with non-security/non-monitored
Electrical Systems. (Again, How does he legally make all the wiring
terminations, connector installations and install, test and program all the
equipment for the AV System without an ME License or Suffolk Restricted
Electrical License?)
3.)
The BEST One: His SAVANT Home Automation System directly interfaces with the Ademco
Security System to Control and Observe it via Wi Fi and iPad via an RS232
connection directly to the alarm control panel. Ron Petrarca, past President of
LIAA offered this, “where does this guy get off doing this? ANY interfacing to
a Security System, be it hard wired or wireless requires a 6D License!” I’ll
bet you can guess what comes next……..yep, NO 6d License for Him, his partner or
his Company.
I
brought this all to the attention of the Electrical/Alarm contractor, whose
comment to me was, “Don’t say anything. I don’t want to lose the job or get
throw off, and not get paid!” Well, you all know me……as soon as I’m compensated
for my labor in full; Phone Calls, Complaint Forms, Fines, Rewards, you all get
the picture! Bottom Line: We all need to be our own “Judge, Jury and Hangman”
when we see unlicensed activity. Report it, make your Contractors, GC’s and
Customers aware that you WILL not tolerate this and WILL report it to the
proper authorities. Suffolk County has an online Complaint Form as well as a
reward system. LIAA and NYESA also have complaint forms available. USE THEM! We
are all in a downsided business, being hacked at from unscrupulous Individuals,
Verizon, Lowe’s and the rest. We owe it to ourselves and our Industry to
promote Legitimate and Licensed Companies; Alarm, Electrical, AV, Automation,
Home Audio, or whomever has jurisdiction over the installation.
Mike Sokoly:
MES
Security/Electrical Training Center
Secretary: Long Island Alarm Association
Friday, July 27, 2012
Monday, March 19, 2012
New Product from SK
From: my friend Nick Markowitz
To: All my Silent Knight Buddies
Nick's Fire - Electrical- Safety & Security Blog: Silent Knight releases new 2 input 2 relay out mo...: The good folks at Silent Knight have come out with a unique module that fits the bill for remotely controlling Doors, Fans and other ancill...
To: All my Silent Knight Buddies
Nick's Fire - Electrical- Safety & Security Blog: Silent Knight releases new 2 input 2 relay out mo...: The good folks at Silent Knight have come out with a unique module that fits the bill for remotely controlling Doors, Fans and other ancill...
Monday, March 12, 2012
OSHA : NOT FOR EVERYONE
I came across this hedge trimming crew last week working in the Hamptons!
Creative construction of a lift or cherry picker beats purchasing a REAL one!
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Double Action/Triple Action
Are double action manual pull stations with stopper covers allowed?
I seem to recall at one point in time that I read somewhere that there could be no more than 2 actions to initiate a manual fire alarm. I actually had a project years ago where we were required to remove the double action and replace them with single action because the stopper cover was treated as an additional action. I have looked in ADA, NFPA, IFC, and spoken to STI and to AHJs in my area and I cannot find anything addressing this issue. Does anyone know of any code addressing this issue?
Answer:
You will no longer find a reference to Manual Station operation other than following the requirements that Covers be listed, and that Cover w/Audible be approved by the AHJ. NFPA 1, 72 & 101 have removed the "No more than 2 actions" phrase from the prescriptive requirements... most likely to allow for reducing nuisance alarms in certain situations. The AHJ is the ultimate approving authority here. Professional engineering judgement, common sense and working with the AHJ are what defines acceptability in this instance, in most jurisdictions.
I seem to recall at one point in time that I read somewhere that there could be no more than 2 actions to initiate a manual fire alarm. I actually had a project years ago where we were required to remove the double action and replace them with single action because the stopper cover was treated as an additional action. I have looked in ADA, NFPA, IFC, and spoken to STI and to AHJs in my area and I cannot find anything addressing this issue. Does anyone know of any code addressing this issue?
Answer:
You will no longer find a reference to Manual Station operation other than following the requirements that Covers be listed, and that Cover w/Audible be approved by the AHJ. NFPA 1, 72 & 101 have removed the "No more than 2 actions" phrase from the prescriptive requirements... most likely to allow for reducing nuisance alarms in certain situations. The AHJ is the ultimate approving authority here. Professional engineering judgement, common sense and working with the AHJ are what defines acceptability in this instance, in most jurisdictions.
Monday, February 27, 2012
National Fire Academy Begins Eighth Year of Coffee Break Training
The U.S. Fire Administration’s (USFA) National Fire Academy (NFA) recently began its eighth year of providing timely and useful instructional tips for first responders through its popular online Coffee Break Training series.
Launched on November 29, 2005, Coffee Break Training consists of one-topic weekly training vignettes
delivered to USFA website visitors and more than 43,000 email
subscribers in the U.S. and around the world. Each training item is designed to be consumed in just a few minutes over a "cup of coffee." The NFA has delivered more than 350 of these training segments since the program began.
The initial Coffee Break series focused on fire protection
topics such as automatic sprinkler systems, building and fire codes,
fire protection water supplies, and safe storage practices. From time to
time there are special lessons developed called "Hot Coffee" (significant emerging issues) and "Special Blend" (reminders of historically significant events / lessons learned). In the last few years, the Coffee Break series has expanded to include fire investigation, fire prevention management, public education, emergency medical services, and research techniques
at the NETC Learning Resource Center. Recently, other parts of the
Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management
Agency began adopting the NFA’s Coffee Break model.
U.S. Fire Administrator Ernie Mitchell said, "The Coffee Break Training series is one of our most popular media for sharing up-to-the minute training. Busy first responders can get a quick and easy-to-read training tip that they can apply the same day it appears."
Deputy Fire Administrator Glenn Gaines added, "The purpose of the Coffee Break Training program is to deliver provocative topics with measurable learning objectives.
They are modeled on Gordon Graham’s insightful ‘five minutes of short,
verifiable training’ that over time accumulates into real performance improvements."
Students who receive the Coffee Break Training series can earn free continuing education units through quarterly exams posted on NFA Online.
For more information, or to sign up for the free Coffee Break Training series, visit the USFA's website.
Monday, February 20, 2012
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Dealing with Non Payers
Subscribers who pay for their alarm systems but stop paying for
telephone or other communication pathways present an issue. You
advise that you are using a Contract, presumably for monitoring. That Monitoring Contract or any Contract with the provision,
clearly requires the subscriber to provide a communication pathway so
that the
system can communicate a signal. The contract is equally clear that
your recurring charges need to be paid even if no communication is
maintained by the subscriber or if the police or fire department decide
not the respond. Your liability is another matter.
If you put the AHJ on notice that you have installed and are monitoring a fire alarm system then you should notify the AHJ that monitoring is not possible. Let your subscriber know that you are obligated, if not legally then morally, to notify the AHJ.
Although you are not contractually obligated to provide notice to the subscriber that it is in breach of the contract by not providing communication it's a good idea. A letter once in a while would be a good idea. If the subscriber stops paying you, sue.
Thanks to Ken Kirschenbaum for this valuable information.
Visit www.alarmcontracts.com for more information.
If you put the AHJ on notice that you have installed and are monitoring a fire alarm system then you should notify the AHJ that monitoring is not possible. Let your subscriber know that you are obligated, if not legally then morally, to notify the AHJ.
Although you are not contractually obligated to provide notice to the subscriber that it is in breach of the contract by not providing communication it's a good idea. A letter once in a while would be a good idea. If the subscriber stops paying you, sue.
Thanks to Ken Kirschenbaum for this valuable information.
Visit www.alarmcontracts.com for more information.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
New CO Regs
The new requirements in the 2012 edition of the International Fire Code (IFC)
and the International Building Code (IBC) are the result of the International Code
Council (ICC) membership approving a proposal during the May 2010 Final Action
Hearing to require the installation of CO detection in new and existing Group-R and
Group-I occupancies, such as hotels, dormitories, apartment buildings, hospitals and
nursing homes.
Section 908.7 of the 2012 IFC and IBC requires CO detection to be installed
in “newly” constructed Group-R and Group-I occupancies if the building contains a
fuel-burning appliance or an attached garage. Also CO alarms shall be installed and maintained in accordance with NFPA 720, Standard for the Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detection and
Warning Equipment, and the manufacturer’s instructions.
Section 1103.9 of the IFC covers the requirements for existing Group-R and
Group-I occupancies, these requirements are the same as those in 908.7 for newly
constructed occupancies.
As with most codes and standards, there are exceptions to the mandatory
requirements. If sleeping units or dwelling units do not contain a fuel-burning
appliance or have an attached garage, but are located in a building with a fuel burning
appliance or an attached garage, CO detection is not required if:
• The sleeping unit or dwelling unit is located more than one story above or below any
story that contains a fuel-burning appliance or an attached garage
• The sleeping unit or dwelling unit is not connected by duct work or ventilation shafts to
an attached garage or any room containing a fuel-burning appliance
• The building is provided with a common area1 CO alarm system.
Also, Section 908.7.1 of the 2012 IBC and IFC clearly permits system connected
CO detectors to be installed as a primary form of protection if they are
installed and maintained in accordance with NFPA 720 and listed as complying
with ANSI/UL 2075. It’s worth mentioning that NFPA 720 permits either CO alarms
ANSI/UL 2034, Single and Multiple Station Carbon Monoxide Alarms,
or CO detectors complying with ANSI/UL 2075, Gas and Vapor Detectors and
Sensors, to be installed.
and the International Building Code (IBC) are the result of the International Code
Council (ICC) membership approving a proposal during the May 2010 Final Action
Hearing to require the installation of CO detection in new and existing Group-R and
Group-I occupancies, such as hotels, dormitories, apartment buildings, hospitals and
nursing homes.
Section 908.7 of the 2012 IFC and IBC requires CO detection to be installed
in “newly” constructed Group-R and Group-I occupancies if the building contains a
fuel-burning appliance or an attached garage. Also CO alarms shall be installed and maintained in accordance with NFPA 720, Standard for the Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detection and
Warning Equipment, and the manufacturer’s instructions.
Section 1103.9 of the IFC covers the requirements for existing Group-R and
Group-I occupancies, these requirements are the same as those in 908.7 for newly
constructed occupancies.
As with most codes and standards, there are exceptions to the mandatory
requirements. If sleeping units or dwelling units do not contain a fuel-burning
appliance or have an attached garage, but are located in a building with a fuel burning
appliance or an attached garage, CO detection is not required if:
• The sleeping unit or dwelling unit is located more than one story above or below any
story that contains a fuel-burning appliance or an attached garage
• The sleeping unit or dwelling unit is not connected by duct work or ventilation shafts to
an attached garage or any room containing a fuel-burning appliance
• The building is provided with a common area1 CO alarm system.
Also, Section 908.7.1 of the 2012 IBC and IFC clearly permits system connected
CO detectors to be installed as a primary form of protection if they are
installed and maintained in accordance with NFPA 720 and listed as complying
with ANSI/UL 2075. It’s worth mentioning that NFPA 720 permits either CO alarms
ANSI/UL 2034, Single and Multiple Station Carbon Monoxide Alarms,
or CO detectors complying with ANSI/UL 2075, Gas and Vapor Detectors and
Sensors, to be installed.
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Record of Completion is Neccessary
A local alarm New York City company didn’t have any use
for the Record of Completion (ROC) form in their NYC office since their
building code states they don’t accept the ROC the NFPA 72 2010 edition
illustrates in Chapter 10.
It seems the local company found he could get by with as little effort as possible. While correct in noting that the city doesn’t want the official NFPA Record of Completion submitted to the Department of Buildings, that doesn’t leave them off the hook for the other AHJs involved. By claiming that it isn’t used in his NYC alarm company branch because NYC doesn’t want it is a bit simplistic. The fact remains—he is responsible for complying with NFPA 72, Section 10.18.2.1.2.3. “A preliminary copy of the record of completion shall be given to the system owner and, if requested, to other authorities having jurisdiction after completion of the installation wiring tests.” Simply because it is not “requested” by NYC doesn’t excuse him from compliance. I’m surprised he has not run into a hotel chain or insurance company requiring this document. It should be completed because it is a signed/witnessed affidavit which states that your code-compliant fire alarm system was turned over to the building owner in perfect working order.
Thanks To Greg Kessinger for this GREAT info!
It seems the local company found he could get by with as little effort as possible. While correct in noting that the city doesn’t want the official NFPA Record of Completion submitted to the Department of Buildings, that doesn’t leave them off the hook for the other AHJs involved. By claiming that it isn’t used in his NYC alarm company branch because NYC doesn’t want it is a bit simplistic. The fact remains—he is responsible for complying with NFPA 72, Section 10.18.2.1.2.3. “A preliminary copy of the record of completion shall be given to the system owner and, if requested, to other authorities having jurisdiction after completion of the installation wiring tests.” Simply because it is not “requested” by NYC doesn’t excuse him from compliance. I’m surprised he has not run into a hotel chain or insurance company requiring this document. It should be completed because it is a signed/witnessed affidavit which states that your code-compliant fire alarm system was turned over to the building owner in perfect working order.
Thanks To Greg Kessinger for this GREAT info!
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
HIRING
Although it would be a great teaching opportunity for educating
prospective alarm license candidates:
NY DOS License Law 6D requires all persons who have knowledge of Alarm install and programming info for a customer to have either a valid license or be properly documented and fingerprinted as an employee. It is a license violation to "help", or allow a non- licensed, non- employee to work on your installation!
Radio
Here we go again!
FCC has announced that GSM is history in 2016!
G3 will be our next best option for alarm reporting over
Radio
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)